16 Minutes of Fame: How Hailey Welch’s Memecoin Backfired Spectacularly

Hailey Welch—better known to the world as the “Hawk Tuah” girl—has become a cautionary tale of what happens when viral fame and unchecked ambition collide, reminiscent of Icarus flying too close to the sun, only to fall victim to his own hubris. From a chance street interview to meme superstardom, Welch’s meteoric rise felt like the quintessential internet success story. Her trajectory echoed Andy Warhol’s famous observation that “in the future, everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes.” Welch herself joked that her fame would stretch to 16 minutes. Yet, as fate would have it, her extended moment in the sun has dimmed under the shadow of scandal, lawsuits, and public ire—all thanks to a now-infamous memecoin called $HAWK.

From Meme to Millions: Welch’s Rapid Ascent

Welch’s journey to internet fame began humbly enough. A casual street interview catapulting her into the internet’s collective consciousness. The clip, endlessly remixed and memed, transformed Welch into the “Hawk Tuah” girl, a symbol of quirky confidence and unintentional comedy. For a time, she leaned into her newfound fame, turning her persona into a brand. Merchandise, podcasts, endorsements, and social media collaborations followed, establishing her as an unlikely influencer with millions of followers across platforms.

Yet Welch was not content to merely bask in the glow of internet celebrity. She sought to monetize her fame in ways that pushed the boundaries of the influencer economy. In late 2024, this ambition culminated in the launch of $HAWK, a cryptocurrency designed to capitalize on her viral persona. Promoted as a “fun and innovative” way for fans to engage with her brand, $HAWK promised exclusivity and value—a chance to own a piece of internet history. Instead, it became a cautionary tale of greed and incompetence.

What Is a Memecoin?

At its core, a memecoin is a cryptocurrency that gains value through cultural or internet phenomena rather than inherent utility or technological innovation. This speculative nature mirrors historical economic bubbles, such as the Tulip Mania of the 17th century, where the value of tulip bulbs skyrocketed due to irrational hype, only to collapse dramatically. Memecoins, with their reliance on fleeting internet trends, embody this same cycle of euphoria and inevitable downfall, leaving investors at the mercy of market whims. Think of Dogecoin, the grandfather of memecoins, which began as a joke but gained legitimacy through its enthusiastic community and celebrity endorsements. These coins often appeal to retail investors drawn by hype, humor, or the promise of quick returns. However, memecoins are notoriously volatile, with values driven by speculation rather than fundamentals. This environment—rife with get-rich-quick schemes—was fertile ground for $HAWK’s dramatic rise and fall.

The $HAWK Disaster Unfolds

Welch’s fall began as spectacularly as her rise, evoking comparisons to figures like Charles Ponzi, whose schemes capitalized on trust and greed but ultimately led to public disgrace. Just as Ponzi’s name became synonymous with fraudulent financial ventures, Welch’s association with $HAWK underscores the enduring lesson that exploiting influence for financial gain often comes at a steep personal and public cost. $HAWK’s launch in December 2024 was a viral success. Within hours, the coin’s value soared to a $490 million market cap, buoyed by Welch’s enthusiastic endorsement and aggressive promotion by OverHere Ltd., a shadowy crypto marketing firm, and Alex Larson Schultz, a self-styled “blockchain entrepreneur.” Investors, many of them Welch’s fans, poured in money, believing in her assurances of a bright future for $HAWK.But the euphoria was short-lived. Within hours, the coin’s value plummeted by over 90%, wiping out millions of dollars in investments. Accusations of a “rug pull” scam emerged almost immediately. A rug pull is a type of cryptocurrency scam in which developers abandon a project after draining investors’ funds. In $HAWK’s case, the creators allegedly orchestrated a pump-and-dump scheme: hyping the coin to drive up its value, selling their holdings at the peak, and leaving ordinary investors to bear the losses.

A Hawkish Silence

For weeks, Welch vanished from public view, her silence amplifying the sense of betrayal felt by investors and fans alike. When she finally resurfaced, her statement—crafted with the unmistakable polish of legal counsel—offered little solace. Pledging to “help uncover the truth” and “take the situation seriously,” Welch’s carefully chosen words did more to protect her than to placate the fury of those who felt duped.

And duped they were. Federal lawsuits soon followed. OverHere Ltd., Clinton So, and Schultz were named as defendants in a case filed in the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for alleged securities violations. Welch, while not officially named in the lawsuit, has faced mounting scrutiny for her role as the public face of the project. Her defense—denying financial involvement and blaming “unfortunate launch issues”—did little to assuage critics. On X (formerly Twitter), accusations of negligence and complicity have dominated the conversation.

The Fickle Fame Game

Welch’s rise from obscurity to meme royalty was, in many ways, a testament to the power of the digital age. With a clever quip and a striking presence, she captured the internet’s collective imagination. But virality is a double-edged sword. The same algorithm that propels a meme to glory can just as quickly turn on its subject, exposing the pitfalls of a platform-driven culture where fame comes fast and responsibility even faster.

Lessons From a Collapse

The $HAWK debacle serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in the influencer economy. Welch’s lack of expertise in cryptocurrency and her reliance on questionable partners like OverHere Ltd. underscore the dangers of jumping into complex financial ventures without due diligence. Moreover, her willingness to lend her name to a project she seemingly did not understand reflects a broader trend of influencers prioritizing short-term gain over long-term integrity.

While Welch’s intentions remain a matter of debate, the fallout is undeniable. Fans who once adored her now feel betrayed. Investors who trusted her are left with empty wallets and unanswered questions. And Welch herself faces the daunting task of rebuilding her reputation in an environment where internet fame is as fleeting as it is unforgiving.

Closing Thoughts

As Hailey Welch surveys the wreckage of her short-lived empire, she might reflect on the nickname that defined her brief moment in the spotlight. Originally a misquote that captured the internet’s imagination, “Hawk Tuah” became both her brand and her undoing. Her rise was fueled by the allure of viral fame, but her fall reveals a sobering truth: charisma and recognition cannot substitute for substance and accountability.

For now, Welch is left to grapple with a hard truth: the internet giveth, and the internet taketh away, echoing the fates of countless figures in history—from Nero, whose public acclaim turned to scorn, to Jay Gatsby, undone by the illusions of grandeur. Fame, as both history and literature remind us, is an unforgiving master. And when it does, it does so with brutal efficiency.

If you don't already please follow @amuse on 𝕏 and subscribe to the Deep Dive podcast.