Delaware’s Corporate Crown Crumbles Under Chancellor McCormick’s Judicial Activism

For more than a century, Delaware has been the nerve center of American business. With over 1.9 million entities incorporated in the First State, including more than 60% of Fortune 500 companies, its legal framework has long provided stability. The state generates an estimated $1.3 billion annually from corporate fees and legal services, revenue that constitutes a staggering 40% of Delaware’s budget. However, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick’s decision to void Elon Musk’s $55 billion Tesla compensation package may have done more than take a swipe at Musk. It has sent corporate America scrambling for the exit.

Delaware’s appeal has always rested on judicial predictability and corporate autonomy. The Court of Chancery’s reputation as an impartial, business-friendly court made it the preferred jurisdiction for America’s most powerful firms. McCormick’s ruling, however, sent shockwaves through boardrooms nationwide. The decision was more than a rebuke of Musk’s pay—it was a blatant case of judicial overreach, nullifying a compensation package that Tesla’s board and shareholders had overwhelmingly approved. This wasn’t just a misguided decision; it was an affront to the very foundation of corporate governance, where shareholders, not unelected judges, determine executive pay.

The injustice deepened when McCormick paved the way for a massive payday for the lawyers who brought the suit, awarding them a staggering $345 million in fees, one of the most outrageous legal windfalls in history. In response, Musk and Tesla took the extraordinary step of holding a second board and shareholder vote, this time incorporating every concern the judge raised in her ruling. With full disclosure and transparency, both the board and shareholders overwhelmingly approved the compensation package once again. Yet McCormick dismissed their decision, upholding her ruling and the lawyers’ massive payout as if shareholder will was irrelevant. The fallout has reinforced a chilling message—Delaware’s courts are no longer a neutral arbiter of corporate disputes but a hazardous liability for businesses. For CEOs and investors, this is an intolerable risk. The ruling creates uncertainty for executives, making Delaware an unstable legal environment—an unforgivable sin for corporations that prize predictability above all else. Musk himself summed it up bluntly: “Delaware is a dying state.”

Musk’s response was swift and decisive. Tesla reincorporated in Texas, following SpaceX and X (formerly Twitter), which had already abandoned Delaware’s jurisdiction. But this was no isolated event. The Trade Desk, a major advertising technology company, won approval to move to Nevada, explicitly citing concerns over Delaware’s growing litigious environment. Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square and industry giants such as DuPont, Ancestry dot com, and Dole have signaled their dissatisfaction, with some taking tangible steps to reincorporate elsewhere.

The departures of Meta and Dropbox further illustrate this trend, with both companies choosing jurisdictions offering more stable governance. In 2023 alone, over 200 corporations, including some of the nation’s most valuable firms, moved their legal domiciles away from Delaware. While some high-profile exits make headlines, experts warn that many companies are quietly shifting their incorporations without public announcements, reinforcing concerns about a 'silent exodus' that is steadily eroding Delaware’s long-standing corporate dominance. States like Texas, Nevada, and Florida, recognizing this shift, have eagerly welcomed these fleeing businesses, further accelerating Delaware’s decline.

The exodus is more than symbolic; it’s a financial catastrophe in the making. The corporate franchise tax is Delaware’s single largest revenue source. If companies continue fleeing, the financial implications could be devastating. If even a small percentage of major companies abandon Delaware, the state could lose hundreds of millions of dollars annually. The legal industry, which specializes in Chancery Court litigation, faces a looming downturn as corporate cases dry up. Investors and executives, wary of activist rulings, are reconsidering Delaware’s legal system altogether.

Delaware’s precarious position isn’t just about McCormick’s ruling. The rise of business-friendly states has provided companies with viable alternatives. Texas offers no state corporate income tax, a business-first legal environment, and a legislature openly hostile to ESG-driven governance overreach. Florida’s pro-business leadership ensures clear judicial deference to corporate autonomy, while Nevada maintains strong corporate protections and less aggressive regulatory frameworks. These states are seizing the moment, actively courting departing corporations and ensuring they never look back.

Delaware once ruled corporate America unchallenged. Now, its dominance is slipping due to judicial activism and legal unpredictability. Chancellor McCormick’s ruling against Musk was a warning shot heard across boardrooms nationwide. CEOs, already wary of Delaware’s shifting legal landscape, are voting with their feet. If Delaware fails to course-correct—by reining in judicial overreach and reaffirming its commitment to business stability—it will soon find itself a relic of corporate history. The message is clear: businesses will not stay where they are no longer welcome.

If you don't already please follow @amuse on 𝕏 and subscribe to the Deep Dive podcast.