5 Comments
User's avatar
Suzie's avatar

Zelensky is practically irrelevant to the entire matter of when or how this war ever ends.

It is the EU and UK who are vested in keeping this war going, and Zelensky is merely their puppet doing their bidding.

As to the “Why” do the EU and UK want this thing to go on in perpetuity while it only hurts them economically and is a veritable killing field as of now, is anybody’s guess.

The only reason I can come up with is that they use it to give them some kind of feeling of self-importance by impeding efforts by the US and Russia’s determinations to end it, which is not just hubris on steroids, but utterly Diabolical.

DDALEX20's avatar

This writing made me think of a problem regarding AI. AI is being used to produce content, and then that content is integrated into data used by AI. A self enforcing model . . .

Flippin’ Jersey's avatar

“To retroactively recast these assurances as guarantees is to rewrite the agreement after the fact.” I am shocked, SHOCKED, that history would be rewritten to support current narratives! Especially when they can be used to bludgeon Mango Mussolini! Or Putin!

Richard Luthmann's avatar

This nuclear fairytale isn’t history — it’s propaganda, and it’s actively blocking peace. Ukraine never had an independent nuclear deterrent, never had launch authority, and never received a U.S. security guarantee. That myth exists to keep the war permanent. By pretending Ukraine was “betrayed” for disarming, elites turn negotiations into treason and realism into heresy. President Trump understands what the myth-peddlers won’t admit: wars end through leverage, not legend. Clarity is strength. Myths harden positions, drain nations, and serve arms dealers and academics, not civilians. Peace requires facts, not sanctified lies dressed up as policy wisdom.

Ruth H's avatar

Ukraine has proven that anything coming from Kiev or Zelenskyy, cannot be trusted.