23 Comments
User's avatar
Pelopidas's avatar

Well done, Mr. Muse. This is symptomatic of many things done by the media where opposition to Trump

Pelopidas's avatar

Well done, Mr. Muse. This is symptomatic of many things done by the media where opposition to Trump is the only true objective. “Never give him credit, always quick to blame” seems to be their over riding theme is all things “Trump”.

TruthB Told's avatar

The reason why is obvious. The MSM is the enemy of those who believe that the individual has the God given right to be free. They are part of the "dark side" in the continuing War between the Forces of Light & Truth and the Forces of Darkness & Lies. Iran is a current battle in that War. I hope & pray the people there win that battle. The War, however, will continue until the Final Battle. Which side are you on?

Mark A Kruger's avatar

Brilliantly argued. Thank you.

Jerrilyn Colangelo's avatar

Trump/Chess vs babies playing in the sand 👏🏻🇺🇸👏🏻

Daniel Meegan's avatar

Narrativenewsnetworks

Ralph Marston's avatar

Legacy media is furiously ratcheting up its own irrelevance to a level from which it cannot possibly recover.

Richard Luthmann's avatar

This is the lie-by-omission moment of our time. The Iranian people are doing the one thing Western media refuses to name: they’re rejecting Islamic rule itself, not begging for a kinder version of it. That shatters the protected narrative, so the cameras turn away. Even worse, honest coverage would force an admission the press can’t stomach—Trump’s unapologetic use of power worked. The regime’s aura cracked. Fear shifted sides. When strength exposes tyranny, the moral preening collapses. So silence becomes policy. Not because journalists don’t know the truth—but because the truth detonates their worldview. This isn’t ignorance. It’s institutional self-preservation.

Jerry Cupples's avatar

I see it more simply. From the viewpoint of most media, Christians and Jews vs. the Moslem world, and they must take their side, as they were historically mistreated by the West. If it seems they are losing, then pretend it is really just a temporary uprising of the mujahadin or whatnot, and should go away soon (2028?). More of what I call their wrongteousness. I'm with the other side, 100%, from the crusades till the present. I have not forgotten the embassy takeover at all.

Double U Economics's avatar

Islam, socialism and communism are all collectivst ideologies that negate and oppress the individual

UM Ross's avatar

"its population is now rising against an indigenous ideological regime, not a foreign imposition."

Islam is not indigenous to Persia. Previously Zoroastrian Persia was conquered by Arab Sunni Muslims in the mid-7th century, and became majority-Muslim only around the 9th–10th centuries, The conversion from Sunni to Shia didn't start until the 16th century.

Thomas Robinson's avatar

Good stuff. Very few can match the consistency, clarity and excellence of your writing.

John Wygertz's avatar

Another trenchant essay, you nailed it again.

One minor quibble, my Iranian friends considered themselves Persian and rejected the Arab imposition of Islam on their culture - to them, it was most definitely not indigenous.

Coco McShevitz's avatar

The way progressives treat Islam is like mirror image Orientalism à la Said.

Belling the Cat's avatar

"To acknowledge this would be to concede that centralized planning and state domination of markets fail catastrophically when accountability disappears"... and it always disappears.

Timothy Andrew Staples/pop122's avatar

Oops. I meant:

Well said, Belling the Cat.

(But I *did* like what Richard wrote!)

Belling the Cat's avatar

Well, he said most of it!

cheers

Timothy Andrew Staples/pop122's avatar

Yes, *some* truths must be hidden...

Well said, Richard.

c Anderson's avatar

It cannot be explained any better than this. “Western media often advocates softer versions of the same economic ideas: expanded state control, moralized redistribution, technocratic management insulated from democratic pressure. Iran demonstrates what happens when such systems harden into ideology and are shielded by theology. It is a case study in failure.”👏🏻 Excellent!

Dave Slough's avatar

I couldn’t put my finger on why MSM was ignoring this story

Thanks for your perspective

S.P.H.'s avatar

Mark Levin on X: "I assume Qatar and Qartarlson are rooting for the Islamist-nazi regime in Iran. They've been awfully quiet".

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 11
Comment deleted
Timothy Andrew Staples/pop122's avatar

Yes, Levin (like how many others?) has, ahem...*loyalties*.

But he tells a helluva lot more truths than one or two.