Trump’s Smartest Judicial Pick Yet: Emil Bove for the Third Circuit

The Case for Confirming Emil Bove to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Emil Bove is not a household name, but he should be. In an age where judicial nominations are too often reduced to ideological proxy wars, Bove’s record provides a rare opportunity for both clarity and consensus. His resume is not just impressive, it is intellectually formidable, professionally disciplined, and morally serious. His nomination to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals by President Trump ought to be evaluated by the standard the Founders intended: merit. And on this standard, Bove passes with distinction.

Let us begin with the indisputable facts of Bove’s formation. He graduated summa cum laude from the University at Albany with a perfect 4.0 GPA, was captain of the men’s lacrosse team, and earned recognition as the America East Conference Scholar Athlete of the Year. At Georgetown Law, one of the most selective and prestigious law schools in the country, Bove served as editor-in-chief of the Annual Review of Criminal Procedure. These are not cosmetic credentials. They indicate a pattern of discipline, academic rigor, and leadership across both intellectual and physical domains.

From there, Bove secured two federal clerkships: one on the District Court and one on the Second Circuit, with respected conservative jurists Richard Sullivan and Richard Wesley. Clerkships at this level are fiercely competitive. They are granted not merely to students with high grades, but to those with exceptional legal reasoning and a demonstrated ability to think precisely, argue clearly, and write with discipline. Bove meets all three qualifications.

Following his clerkships, he worked at Sullivan & Cromwell, a premier international law firm whose alumni populate the top echelons of the bar and judiciary. Yet unlike many who remain in lucrative corporate practice, Bove chose public service. He joined the Southern District of New York as a federal prosecutor, where he became co-chief of the National Security and International Narcotics Unit. In this role, Bove prosecuted some of the most dangerous and complex threats to national security, including international drug traffickers and terrorist conspiracies. These are not theoretical matters. They involve decisions that protect or endanger lives. His results speak for themselves: guilty verdicts in high-profile cases such as the conviction of Tony Hernández, a Honduran congressman and brother to that country’s president, and a foiled Hezbollah plot in New York.

One could stop there and conclude he is qualified. But Bove’s legal excellence does not plateau. In 2025, he was appointed Acting Deputy Attorney General of the United States. In that role, Bove demonstrated precisely the qualities one wants in a federal judge: clarity, integrity, courage, and fidelity to the rule of law. When federal prosecutors brought a politically sensitive case against New York City' Democrat Mayor Eric Adams, Bove reviewed the facts, found the basis for prosecution insufficient, and moved to dismiss. He did so not because of political pressure but because, as the federal judge later affirmed by dismissing the case with prejudice, the evidence simply did not warrant prosecution.

What makes this episode instructive is not that Bove made a hard call. It is that he made the right call, in the face of institutional resistance. When subordinate officials refused to implement the dismissal, Bove did not cave to bureaucratic inertia. He signed the dismissal himself. This was not arrogance, it was constitutional fidelity. As Bove himself remarked, prosecutors do not run their own kingdoms. The executive power belongs to the President. This is not merely a soundbite. It is a reaffirmation of Article II of the Constitution.

Such understanding of constitutional structure is no minor qualification. In an appellate judge, it is essential. The judiciary is not an abstraction. It is a branch. Its legitimacy depends on respecting the boundaries of its role. Bove’s fidelity to that principle is evident in his every professional choice. He has prosecuted dangerous criminals, advised complex investigations, defended clients in private practice, and led one of the nation’s most critical legal departments—always with clarity, always with integrity.

Moreover, Bove possesses precisely the kind of balanced perspective that enriches appellate jurisprudence. He has been both a prosecutor and a defense attorney. He has worked in New York and in New Jersey, the state from which this Third Circuit seat arises. He has operated at the highest levels of the Department of Justice, yet never detached himself from the real work of cases and courts. His understanding is both doctrinal and practical. That is, perhaps, the most important attribute for a federal judge. It means he will decide not from abstraction but from informed judgment, rooted in law and experience.

He is also, by all available accounts, a person of exceptional character. Former colleagues describe him as relentless, yes, but also principled and fair. He does not substitute aggression for argument. He wins cases not by cutting corners but by exhausting the law’s full resources. His legal mind is sharp, his ethical compass steady.

And in our current moment, when the judiciary is under populist scrutiny and partisan attack, it matters immensely to nominate individuals who elevate the bench’s stature. Bove does precisely that. He is not a political operative in robes. He is a lawyer’s lawyer. And that, paradoxically, is what our politics needs most.

So the Senate now faces a test: not of ideology, but of principle. Will it confirm a nominee who represents the best of the American legal tradition? Or will it reduce yet another judicial seat to the stale theater of partisanship? The case for confirmation is straightforward. Bove has the mind, the experience, the integrity, and the temperament. He is, to borrow from Hamilton, not a man of faction but of competence. He understands law not as a tool of political vengeance but as an architecture of ordered liberty.

The American people deserve judges who grasp this. Emil Bove is such a judge. Confirming him would be not merely a win for the President. It would be a win for the Constitution.

If you enjoy my work, please consider subscribing https://x.com/amuse.