Unpacking President Trump's Motion to Dismiss D.C. Case on Grounds of Presidential Immunity

President Trump has filed a motion to dismiss the case against him in Washington, D.C., citing presidential immunity as the basis for dismissal. This development is monumental and could have far-reaching implications, not just for this case but also for the ongoing prosecution in Georgia. In this article, we will delve deep into the legal arguments presented in the motion and assess their validity.

The Core Argument: Presidential Immunity

At the heart of the motion is the argument that presidents, even after leaving office, are absolutely immune from criminal prosecutions for acts that fall within the "outer perimeter" of their official responsibilities. This immunity, the motion contends, is deeply rooted in legal principles, caselaw, and the Constitution.