6 Comments
User's avatar
Suzie's avatar

It’s just gambling wearing a different costume. May as well be a lottery. People who like to gamble like this are not exactly the people we should be listening to.

This entire election in every state, town, and county, will be determined by one thing and one thing only: turnout. And there’s not a poll or a fancy gambling app that can reliably predict that.

William Lomax's avatar

DITTO ................

Ruth H's avatar

Polymarket cannot determine an election any more than buying a lottery ticket determines your wealth. It’s gambling and a billionaire can easily sway the market. Talarico has big donors from CA and NY, not Texas, who can easily sway their candidate to look winnable. As far as Brazil is concerned, Polymarket may need to hold off on paying the winners until this has been decided. The Election Committee there has ruled the SC Judge had no authority to grant a voting extension.

James Arthur's avatar

Alex, I get this. I love it when you nerd out! But I wonder how many of your followers do. I know you would be condescending to begin or end this piece with a simple statement of your argument in sort of see Jack run terms, but few people are as smart as you. I know it’s genetic.

Doug Ross's avatar

Analysis last week of Kalshi: Fake Polls and Prediction Markets

On Kalshi, Paxton’s Price is 36. The Facts Say 47.

https://directorblue.substack.com/p/fake-polls-and-prediction-markets

Daniel Meegan's avatar

Paxton Landslide after they're gutflush of Hogwash accusing courtroom fiasco everyone knows who is Who and What is WHAAAT