This is one of the most important discussions we can have in the US presently. It is a fact that everyone who is undocumented is illegally here, having intentionally broken federal immigration laws. All of Mr. Muse's arguments are valid, in my opinion. Additionally, anyone familiar with policing in America can tell you that many criminals - especially Blue states or cities - are not prosecuted ever, even for violent crimes. If we go by arrest rates (and the fact that only two states require documented immigrant status makes this very difficult to prove), the criminality of illegal aliens is very high. As an aside, my sister was a Child Protection Services case worker. She said that child abuse and molestation among the illegal communities was very, very high. Ending illegal immigration, to the degree that is possible, and deporting the 20 -30+ million already here, while passing the SAVE Act to ensure more honest elections, is a battle for the future of this country. Illegal status should = automatic deportation save the very, very few political refugees.
Crime data isnβt magic β it reflects what you count and what you ignore. If deportations remove offenders from the sampling frame, if plea deals compress charges into immigration violations, and if underreporting suppresses victimization statistics, then headline comparisons deserve scrutiny. Public policy should rest on transparent methodology, not talking points. That means distinguishing between citizens, lawful immigrants, and those here unlawfully β and being clear about which offenses are included. It also means resisting blanket claims that inflame rather than inform. Immigration enforcement is a legitimate debate. So is data integrity. But serious reform requires honest accounting, not selective statistics or partisan caricatures.
Democrats lie constantly.
Well, they started deporting people, and everywhere it was done, crime dropped. ππ
Narrative stats are nonsense.
Excellent! Thank you for exposing the false methodology behind this claim.
Aliens?
This is one of the most important discussions we can have in the US presently. It is a fact that everyone who is undocumented is illegally here, having intentionally broken federal immigration laws. All of Mr. Muse's arguments are valid, in my opinion. Additionally, anyone familiar with policing in America can tell you that many criminals - especially Blue states or cities - are not prosecuted ever, even for violent crimes. If we go by arrest rates (and the fact that only two states require documented immigrant status makes this very difficult to prove), the criminality of illegal aliens is very high. As an aside, my sister was a Child Protection Services case worker. She said that child abuse and molestation among the illegal communities was very, very high. Ending illegal immigration, to the degree that is possible, and deporting the 20 -30+ million already here, while passing the SAVE Act to ensure more honest elections, is a battle for the future of this country. Illegal status should = automatic deportation save the very, very few political refugees.
Duh
Bottom line: if you want the truth about ANYTHING these days you have to go search for it.
Otherwise youβre just prey for the blizzard of lies blowing all around and trying to bury you.
Whether it's counting residents for the census or criminal aliens for the MSM, accuracy is the least consideration.
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_cb4dcfb0-1bef-47c4-b77b-10cbd4a920c0
Crime data isnβt magic β it reflects what you count and what you ignore. If deportations remove offenders from the sampling frame, if plea deals compress charges into immigration violations, and if underreporting suppresses victimization statistics, then headline comparisons deserve scrutiny. Public policy should rest on transparent methodology, not talking points. That means distinguishing between citizens, lawful immigrants, and those here unlawfully β and being clear about which offenses are included. It also means resisting blanket claims that inflame rather than inform. Immigration enforcement is a legitimate debate. So is data integrity. But serious reform requires honest accounting, not selective statistics or partisan caricatures.
No surprise!