Thank-you for clearly delineating the issues leading to the controversy of the 2020 election. Most people appear to not know why many question the legitimacy of the election - and the procedures under which it was conducted.
This is the best explanation of why the election was not valid I've read in the six years since the election. The plain reading of the Constitution is clear. We are not a country of laws created by exigency or whims of the elected politicians or the unelected bureaucrat. The bounds were set and only a legislative process may change an election. Thank you!
Excellent as always. I’m sick of the Dems, RINOs, deep state, Uniparty whatever, twisting the words of Our Constitution for their benefit only. Even Supreme Court Justices seem to disregard what our founders wrote. They were brilliant men. I can’t make the same claim of the caliber of the men and women today.
Well written. Thank you! Another example as to how little meaning the Constitution has for democrats. Under Article 2 Biden was certified. Something Warsh explained. But, Alas, trying to communicate with chimpanzees can be difficult at times. And yes, this isn't the first time democrat chimps have attempted to vilify those believing in the Constitution.
I watched the witch hunt in its entirety yesterday. Asking whether he believed Trump won 2020 was not just irrelevant, but unconstitutional. Watching USAID FRAUD QUEEN Elizabeth Picahontas Warren yap made me nauseated. A stark reminder as to how much of an epic fail our Congress and DOJ has been. The only question that woman should be asking is if her fellow inmates can pass the soap!
No fed chair to date has ever been required to divulge specifically what their investments were. Just the amount and that they offload it within 90 days of assuming the chair. Liz knows this. They all do. Should they have to? I'd say the Constitution says no. Clarence Thomas very recently spoke on this very subject.
What a perfect analogy. One so simple even a Democrat could understand it, if they wanted to.
In 2012, I filed a lawsuit against Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted in an effort to keep Barack Obama off our ballot because he was using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number. It included an 18-page Complaint and 83 pages of supporting documents.
ORC 111.24 says the OH Sec. of State was required to investigate if someone brought to his attention that fraud was involved. Husted refused. No one showed up for the hearing, and the lawsuit was dismissed three days later. The four-page Dismissal included this: "Plaintiff somehow equates use of an improper social security number as a disqualifying event..."
My opinion here , this is why Democrats have spent 50+ years changing the American school system . If you cannot read the Constitution then you cannot interpret it properly ! Excellent analysis of how the election + electors work . Just remember our original documents are written in cursive writing !
As presented, taking the Constitutional text literally, could this mean that in addition to state judiciary and executive officers being unable to supersede state election laws governing Federal elections, a governor is unable to veto state laws governing Federal elections?
Trump lawyers lost every single case brought on your theories, with one exception over Pennsylvania postmarks that affected a few dozen ballots.
By the way, the Governor of Texas also used emergency powers related to COVID to change some procedures but since Trump won there easily, you don’t care.
Beautiful! So well put I remain in awe. Thank you. And that doesn’t even fully address the actual cheating in computers and fake ballots. Oh my!
Thank-you for clearly delineating the issues leading to the controversy of the 2020 election. Most people appear to not know why many question the legitimacy of the election - and the procedures under which it was conducted.
This is the best explanation of why the election was not valid I've read in the six years since the election. The plain reading of the Constitution is clear. We are not a country of laws created by exigency or whims of the elected politicians or the unelected bureaucrat. The bounds were set and only a legislative process may change an election. Thank you!
Excellent as always. I’m sick of the Dems, RINOs, deep state, Uniparty whatever, twisting the words of Our Constitution for their benefit only. Even Supreme Court Justices seem to disregard what our founders wrote. They were brilliant men. I can’t make the same claim of the caliber of the men and women today.
Well written. Thank you! Another example as to how little meaning the Constitution has for democrats. Under Article 2 Biden was certified. Something Warsh explained. But, Alas, trying to communicate with chimpanzees can be difficult at times. And yes, this isn't the first time democrat chimps have attempted to vilify those believing in the Constitution.
I watched the witch hunt in its entirety yesterday. Asking whether he believed Trump won 2020 was not just irrelevant, but unconstitutional. Watching USAID FRAUD QUEEN Elizabeth Picahontas Warren yap made me nauseated. A stark reminder as to how much of an epic fail our Congress and DOJ has been. The only question that woman should be asking is if her fellow inmates can pass the soap!
No fed chair to date has ever been required to divulge specifically what their investments were. Just the amount and that they offload it within 90 days of assuming the chair. Liz knows this. They all do. Should they have to? I'd say the Constitution says no. Clarence Thomas very recently spoke on this very subject.
Outstanding once again!👏👏👏👏👏
Well done. Thank you!
What a perfect analogy. One so simple even a Democrat could understand it, if they wanted to.
In 2012, I filed a lawsuit against Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted in an effort to keep Barack Obama off our ballot because he was using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number. It included an 18-page Complaint and 83 pages of supporting documents.
ORC 111.24 says the OH Sec. of State was required to investigate if someone brought to his attention that fraud was involved. Husted refused. No one showed up for the hearing, and the lawsuit was dismissed three days later. The four-page Dismissal included this: "Plaintiff somehow equates use of an improper social security number as a disqualifying event..."
Thank you for doing this.
Bravo and THANK YOU! May your argument be proclaimed more widely. May more leaders have real understanding of Constitutional principles.
My opinion here , this is why Democrats have spent 50+ years changing the American school system . If you cannot read the Constitution then you cannot interpret it properly ! Excellent analysis of how the election + electors work . Just remember our original documents are written in cursive writing !
If you cannot read cursive, you cannot read the founding documents.
As presented, taking the Constitutional text literally, could this mean that in addition to state judiciary and executive officers being unable to supersede state election laws governing Federal elections, a governor is unable to veto state laws governing Federal elections?
Trump lawyers lost every single case brought on your theories, with one exception over Pennsylvania postmarks that affected a few dozen ballots.
By the way, the Governor of Texas also used emergency powers related to COVID to change some procedures but since Trump won there easily, you don’t care.
I don't see that Muse said that re Texas governor.
Exactly. He enumerated only examples from blue states. And as I said, these issues were tried in court with almost-unanimous lack of success.
Is North Carolina a blue state?
Wake up. We are in a soft civil war and the Constitution affords zero protection from those who will stop at nothing to seize and wield power.
Amen
https://foreignlocal.substack.com/p/how-joe-barely-won-the-presidency?r=2vnoe2&utm_medium=ios
Great article. I restacked as a reminder to all what the Dems did and got away with.