Europe/NATO is the impotent partner in a long term, failed marriage of 81 years. They do not fulfill the terms of their part of our agreement, their leaders are cowards who unable or unwilling to protect their own citizens against invading hordes of illegal Africans and Muslims. Knowing this, why would we expect them to honor their word to us? It is time we divorce NATO and let them learn to take care of themselves.
We have a great many roads here that are named after NATO - One Way. So good luck, and donβt let the door hit you on the way out.
NATO served a purpose when first organized; America was the biggest, strongest, wealthiest nation in the world having defeated both Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, and the USSR was the second biggest and strongest nation, albeit economically much further behind. However, it had its eye on expanding its hegemony as far west in Europe as America would allow. No European nation escaped WW II with anything like a viable army and stable economy, so if Stalin was to be opposed, it had to be by the USA. Truman and Eisenhower both recognized this, ergo, NATO. Although in theory a mutual defense pact, it was in reality an America-defends-Western-Europe pact. America rebuilt Europe with the Marshall Plan, and the Europeans got very comfortable having America guarantee the continuing sovereignty of its constituent nations against the Soviet threat. Times change. The USSR fell apart and the threat to Europe faded substantially. But there were then too many interests that had vested in a continued NATO, both in Europe and America. It was not really until Trump dropped the turd into the NATO punchbowl that it became apparent that the fiction of NATO was exposed for what it was.. At the same time, the American economy, although still the strongest in the world, was being assailed from China from one side and its soi disant "allies" in Europe from the other. Again, it was businessman Trump who spoke up and pointed this out, but while still agreeing to keep Europe under an American shield, demanded that those protected nations contribute to their own defense. I am of the opinion that America can and should reduce the size of its European shield, but not (yet) withdraw forces from the continent. I, like Trump am a proponent of "America First," but I am not an isolationist, nor is Trump because the world had become too small for that to be a viable option. We no longer can shield completely between two oceans; nuclear tipped missiles make that impossible. Appropriate engagement with other nations with whom we can make common cause is still a good idea. And in regard to Poland's rebuff of the request for missile defense to Turkey, I maintain that Turkey, under Erdogan, has no business even being in NATO; Erdogan has made it clear that he is not a friend to America. He fancies himself the caliph of the resurrected Ottoman Empire and its ascendant islamism. Christian America should have nothing to do with him, nor the nation he leads as long as he and others of his islamic ilk remain in power. Thus, I support Poland's decisison, regardless of any "treaty obligation" it had on paper.
Since the United States pays for most of NATO and supplies the arms and troops, while the EU NATO nations are spending 5% or less of their GDPs, the NATO countries of the EU, specifically the U.K., France, Spain, Germany and Italy have been increasing their social welfare and socialized healthcare programs at our expense. Also, we have tens of thousands of U.S. troops in those European countries that spend millions of dollars for housing, food, etc. The aforementioned NATO countries are using the money they need for defense on welfare for illegal aliens, for increasing and expanding socialized medicine in those countries, and basically thumbing their noses at the U.S. It is time to pull back our troops and close our bases in those countries and let them fend for themselves. Then we'll see if those countries can afford their welfare programs, especially for illegals. It's time to keep our money at home. As President Trump said just recently, "We don't need our allies to send warships to protect the Strait of Hormuz. We can do it ourselves, even though we don't import Iranian oil.
No help in the Strait of Hormuz and Spain literally evicted our air assets from NATO bases and it's airspace. It is my hope that president Trump is quietly building a US case against NATO and drops the hammer soon. This is embarrassing!
Poland has two. They are the defense of eastern corridor
Other countries with battery systems: Germany, Netherland, Romania, Spain, Greece, Sweden, Ukraine
Take Romania and Ukraine off list: they are equally busy.
US sent new systems to Incirlik Air Base Turkey from Ramstein Air Base in Germany
BUT as reflected by the article: Turkish authorities stated Turkish airspace, land and territorial waters will not be used for operations against Iran.
No mention of the other base at Malatya
So we are sending resources to places that are not supporting us
This is the moment the curtain drops. NATO isnβt dyingβitβs being exposed. An alliance where members can refuse aid in a live missile crisis while enjoying full U.S. protection isnβt mutual defense. Itβs dependency dressed up as strategy. For years, Washington footed the bill while Europe deferred the risk. Now the bill is due, and nobody wants to pay. Poland didnβt just say no to Turkeyβit said no to the idea of shared sacrifice. And that changes everything. Because once allies start acting like customers, the guarantor starts thinking like a creditor. And creditors eventually collectβor they walk away.
Poland has been railroaded, due to its proximital closeness with countries that wanted NATO involvement. Trying to stand alone on its own principles would have been suicide. This actually was a brave act on Poland's part and I sincerely hope this brings NATO down! Poland has held its national purity by maintaining its borders against the Muslim invasion, doing what the USA did not to protect her people. When this is all said and done, Poland will always fight for freedom and choose USA without the burden of NATO.
The only thing that will make them take defense seriously is for them to have to protect their countries. And right now, Europe is allowing conquest by Muslims. We need to set a time line to take down these bases, to immediately leave NATO and set up new bases with real allies.
America is the battered wife of NATO who keeps staying, expecting things to get better.
In Poland's defense: they won't allow Muslims into their country. No one in Poland is getting shot in the back or being thrown in front of a subway train by illegals.
make america go away. thank you for your attention in this matter.
Europe/NATO is the impotent partner in a long term, failed marriage of 81 years. They do not fulfill the terms of their part of our agreement, their leaders are cowards who unable or unwilling to protect their own citizens against invading hordes of illegal Africans and Muslims. Knowing this, why would we expect them to honor their word to us? It is time we divorce NATO and let them learn to take care of themselves.
We have a great many roads here that are named after NATO - One Way. So good luck, and donβt let the door hit you on the way out.
"I Like Ike" has never been more appropriate.
NATO served a purpose when first organized; America was the biggest, strongest, wealthiest nation in the world having defeated both Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, and the USSR was the second biggest and strongest nation, albeit economically much further behind. However, it had its eye on expanding its hegemony as far west in Europe as America would allow. No European nation escaped WW II with anything like a viable army and stable economy, so if Stalin was to be opposed, it had to be by the USA. Truman and Eisenhower both recognized this, ergo, NATO. Although in theory a mutual defense pact, it was in reality an America-defends-Western-Europe pact. America rebuilt Europe with the Marshall Plan, and the Europeans got very comfortable having America guarantee the continuing sovereignty of its constituent nations against the Soviet threat. Times change. The USSR fell apart and the threat to Europe faded substantially. But there were then too many interests that had vested in a continued NATO, both in Europe and America. It was not really until Trump dropped the turd into the NATO punchbowl that it became apparent that the fiction of NATO was exposed for what it was.. At the same time, the American economy, although still the strongest in the world, was being assailed from China from one side and its soi disant "allies" in Europe from the other. Again, it was businessman Trump who spoke up and pointed this out, but while still agreeing to keep Europe under an American shield, demanded that those protected nations contribute to their own defense. I am of the opinion that America can and should reduce the size of its European shield, but not (yet) withdraw forces from the continent. I, like Trump am a proponent of "America First," but I am not an isolationist, nor is Trump because the world had become too small for that to be a viable option. We no longer can shield completely between two oceans; nuclear tipped missiles make that impossible. Appropriate engagement with other nations with whom we can make common cause is still a good idea. And in regard to Poland's rebuff of the request for missile defense to Turkey, I maintain that Turkey, under Erdogan, has no business even being in NATO; Erdogan has made it clear that he is not a friend to America. He fancies himself the caliph of the resurrected Ottoman Empire and its ascendant islamism. Christian America should have nothing to do with him, nor the nation he leads as long as he and others of his islamic ilk remain in power. Thus, I support Poland's decisison, regardless of any "treaty obligation" it had on paper.
Excellent analysis. Thank you. Time for US to exit NATO.
NATO can't get out of it's own way. And it's proved, once again, to be a post-WWII anachronism.
Since the United States pays for most of NATO and supplies the arms and troops, while the EU NATO nations are spending 5% or less of their GDPs, the NATO countries of the EU, specifically the U.K., France, Spain, Germany and Italy have been increasing their social welfare and socialized healthcare programs at our expense. Also, we have tens of thousands of U.S. troops in those European countries that spend millions of dollars for housing, food, etc. The aforementioned NATO countries are using the money they need for defense on welfare for illegal aliens, for increasing and expanding socialized medicine in those countries, and basically thumbing their noses at the U.S. It is time to pull back our troops and close our bases in those countries and let them fend for themselves. Then we'll see if those countries can afford their welfare programs, especially for illegals. It's time to keep our money at home. As President Trump said just recently, "We don't need our allies to send warships to protect the Strait of Hormuz. We can do it ourselves, even though we don't import Iranian oil.
No help in the Strait of Hormuz and Spain literally evicted our air assets from NATO bases and it's airspace. It is my hope that president Trump is quietly building a US case against NATO and drops the hammer soon. This is embarrassing!
Poland has two. They are the defense of eastern corridor
Other countries with battery systems: Germany, Netherland, Romania, Spain, Greece, Sweden, Ukraine
Take Romania and Ukraine off list: they are equally busy.
US sent new systems to Incirlik Air Base Turkey from Ramstein Air Base in Germany
BUT as reflected by the article: Turkish authorities stated Turkish airspace, land and territorial waters will not be used for operations against Iran.
No mention of the other base at Malatya
So we are sending resources to places that are not supporting us
This is the moment the curtain drops. NATO isnβt dyingβitβs being exposed. An alliance where members can refuse aid in a live missile crisis while enjoying full U.S. protection isnβt mutual defense. Itβs dependency dressed up as strategy. For years, Washington footed the bill while Europe deferred the risk. Now the bill is due, and nobody wants to pay. Poland didnβt just say no to Turkeyβit said no to the idea of shared sacrifice. And that changes everything. Because once allies start acting like customers, the guarantor starts thinking like a creditor. And creditors eventually collectβor they walk away.
Excellent essay, thank you.
About time to disengage
Poland has been railroaded, due to its proximital closeness with countries that wanted NATO involvement. Trying to stand alone on its own principles would have been suicide. This actually was a brave act on Poland's part and I sincerely hope this brings NATO down! Poland has held its national purity by maintaining its borders against the Muslim invasion, doing what the USA did not to protect her people. When this is all said and done, Poland will always fight for freedom and choose USA without the burden of NATO.
The only thing that will make them take defense seriously is for them to have to protect their countries. And right now, Europe is allowing conquest by Muslims. We need to set a time line to take down these bases, to immediately leave NATO and set up new bases with real allies.
Time is UP! Adios blood suckers! We will cheer for your success in repelling Putin and his Russian army.
America is the battered wife of NATO who keeps staying, expecting things to get better.
In Poland's defense: they won't allow Muslims into their country. No one in Poland is getting shot in the back or being thrown in front of a subway train by illegals.
bot alert
Interesting post. My added 5 cents from November 2025 hereβ¦
https://foreignlocal.substack.com/p/europes-manufactured-russia-hoax