93 Comments
User's avatar
Did you know?'s avatar

I think a proper name would be militia

Bertram Kierkegaard's avatar

Do you really have to use AI to slopify a murder victim?

komplex live cinema group's avatar

for years , decades from the 60ies we had in italy the AUTONOMI … they where a mixed force,,, then arrived the BLACK BLOC … paid by corporate to create chaos and violent reactions … welcome to EUROPE my friends …welcome to the worst elite ever lived in this planet .. the ones that genocided the FULL latin america the BORBONI of Spain the BOurbon yes the makers of the whisky and the Turn UND TAXIS … the european nobility created communism to enslave the workers not to make them free. and now they are operating in your soil.

Malte's avatar

The ICE protester narrative reveals something deeper. When institutions need enemies, they manufacture them from whatever raw material exists. The pattern repeats because we keep accepting the premise that some protest is legitimate while other protest is not. What would happen if we stopped debating the protesters and started questioning why dissent itself has become criminalized?

SH68137's avatar

Pretti committed a felony with his behavior, interfering in law enforcement activities. Thus, this felony disqualifies him from claiming a self-defense action.

If law enforcement attacked him in an unofficial action, all bets would be off.

However, his actions, even without intent, put him in a lose-lose situation.

As someone who carries a firearm daily and understands how to respond when approached by law enforcement, I know what to do to ensure I "go home at the end of the day." Unfortunately, Pretti did not.

Tim's avatar

These ‘recruitment’ operations are aggregating the sickest and ugliest of our kind. Many truly do not care about the human suffering they purport to. Their movement is their god—and for some it is strictly excitement to combat boredom. For many it is about the money. One thing for sure: most of these folks don’t believe in the America that we have grown up in. I’ve never seen so many able-bodied people available during working hours; makes me wonder how many are living the ‘subsidized’ lifestyle.

Kendon Curtis's avatar

Sadly he is a victim. Not a victim of the shooting but a victim of the democrat cult, and plantation.

Mark1's avatar

These groups are playing “Who Wants to be a Martyr?”. They all want one; just nobody wants to be “it”.

Tim Raybon's avatar

This was almost two weeks ago. What you DON’T see here, Minneapolis police. They were told to stand down. If they were there, THEY WOULD Have ARRESTED HIM for assaulting ICE!

AND HE WOULD BE ALIVE.

If I were Mayor Frye, I would lawyer up!

Christopher Rixman's avatar

This critique is riddled with factual overreach and sloppy definitions, starting with its misuse of the term “peaceful protester,” which it redefines to fit a predetermined conclusion rather than established legal or journalistic standards.

A lot of this piece hinges on claims that are being presented as settled fact when they are not. That matters.

There is credible reporting that Alex Pretti participated in ICE Watch networks and that Signal chats existed coordinating real-time monitoring of ICE activity. Reuters has confirmed the existence of activist Signal groups used to track ICE movements and that law enforcement is now reviewing those communications. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/ice-appears-shift-gears-minnesota-amid-mixed-messaging-trump-2026-01-29/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

What is not established is the central allegation that Pretti was definitively the Signal user “Alvin Q.” Even Muse acknowledges that identification is not proven. That distinction is not minor. It is the difference between reporting and inference.

Likewise, whether Pretti violated Minnesota carry law by failing to carry ID or permit is currently based on family statements and secondary reporting, not on a charging document or court finding. That makes it an unresolved factual question, not a settled legal conclusion.

Where this piece goes too far is in collapsing three separate questions into one conclusion:

• Was Pretti involved in organized activism? • Did he escalate risk by physically engaging officers while armed? • Does that legally justify the shooting under Supreme Court standards?

Those are related questions. They are not interchangeable. Treating them as such turns analysis into advocacy.

The public deserves precise distinctions here. Not narratives that blur fact, inference, and legal argument into a single storyline.

Tim's avatar

Instead of nitpicking criticism and allegations of an operation versus a spontaneous protest, why don’t you go do something good and help the American citizen families that lost innocent victims to these illegal immigrant monsters that are being picked up. I’m not saying that every illegal immigrant is a monster, but why can’t we acknowledge the good that is being done and catching criminals? Why can’t we admit that the sanctuary policies of harboring these criminals is harming our public? Where is that criticism? Pretti was no innocent victim. He was ‘playing Army’ like so many of these lost and bored people. No one wants he should lose his life—but like Renee Goode—if you involved in interference of active law enforcement investigations—FAFO. Sorry, but it is common sense.

TeeKay's avatar

I think the author laid out what was certain and what was speculation.

Fair enough. This is not a court of law.

Christopher Rixman's avatar

This is the stupidest reply ever. Our democracy is the RULE OF LAW. That’s how it works, you don't get to just disregard it , because vibes or you don't like it.. MORON

TeeKay's avatar

Your feelings get hurt easily and without much provocation.

How did the world ever start revolving around just you by the way?

Tell me your journey to the center of the earth and to become the fountain of all knowledge.

I am laughing at your insults to be clear. You are shallow as a rain puddle.

Demonhype's avatar

They have nothing to go on but insults. As far as they're concerned, you are not allowed to have an opinion or weigh available evidence unless you are a TDS Democrat and come to the prescribed conclusions of The Party. Anything else is wrong and evil and stupid and sometimes fascist. I'm guessing they didn't have that same position when it came to Ashli Babbit and the slander machine that demonized her and portrayed her murderer as a saint, and I'm guessing they honestly do no see how much of a double standard that is.

Christopher Rixman's avatar

Please don’t procreate.

TeeKay's avatar

I am procreating well above average family size.

You can die on the hill of feminine men who had their feelings hurt.

Bossa Nogi's avatar

Just another Communist jackboot mud toy.

Theodore Whitfield's avatar

This is very helpful. Thank you.

"he inserted himself physically into a confrontation with federal officers while carrying a loaded firearm and additional magazines, in violation of Minnesota law,"

I'm unclear about one thing. Was it illegal for Pretti to have multiple magazines on his person? This passage seems to suggest so.

NDCrouch's avatar

Under Minnesota law it is illegal to carry the gun at all without your Concealed Carry permit and ID.

Theodore Whitfield's avatar

Thank you! That is very helpful.

But what about the magazines? Are multiple magazines allowed?

Demonhype's avatar

As another commenter stated, magazines are a heavy pain to carry and its unlikely anyone would be carrying more than one under average armed citizen circumstances. That commenter carries a gun and stated they only carry one for that reason, unless you anticipate you will need them you aren't going to want to deadline that much all over town.

Demonhype's avatar

Argh! Deadlift, not deadline! Stupid autocorrect.

Theodore Whitfield's avatar

Thank you! That was very informative.

NDCrouch's avatar

Thanks. I would think that the need to carry 51 projectiles might hint at nefarious intent,, but fortunately, I'm not a Minnesota resident.

Katherine Blair's avatar

Thank you for this article.

George Garfinkel's avatar

If there is going to be responsibility placed for this man’s senseless death, I think it clearly belongs to Mayor Frey and Governor Walz, both of whom could have long ago put a stop to their senseless policies. Protesters can surely protest, but have no business being anywhere near law enforcement activities. How is it possible there was not a single member of Minnesota law enforcement anywhere near this so called protest?

Barb's avatar

As in all individual decisions, this man’s fate was his responsibility alone. He chose to incorporate other’s ideals with his own desires. Blaming other’s idiotic directives, from “leaders” or others, does not negate his responsibility for his own actions.

New Considerist's avatar

A 37 year old in need of some commonsense advice from his parents seems to be part of the problem. Not unlike Renee Good, also 37, getting Venmoed by her mom in order to make the rent.