This wasn’t law enforcement—it was lawfare with a Soviet accent. Jack Smith didn’t misunderstand the First Amendment; he tried to route around it. By relabeling political speech as “fraud,” he attempted to jail a former president for believing—and saying—the wrong thing. That’s not American justice. That’s Orwellian thought-crime regime dressed up in legal jargon. Once prosecutors get to decide what you “knew,” free speech is dead on arrival. Today it’s Trump. Tomorrow, it’s any dissenter who refuses to bow to official truth. Smith’s theory belongs in The Hague, not the United States. We dodged a bullet—but only because voters, not courts, stopped it.
Amuse establishes the inescapable conclusion that Jack Smith acted unconstitutional and illegally in the criminal sense. His acts were designed not to vindicate known rights but to punish political speech and legitimate legal advocacy. The disbursement orgy that followed in Smith's wake was of the same cloth. Will the US Attorney in Miami, Jason Reding Quinones, put Smith in the target list along with Brennan et al? He is a capable independent prosecutor. I know him. He is a decent fellow. I was supposed to work with him on these cases and was ready to be sworn in as an Assistant US Attorney there. But AG Bondi overruled Quinones. Let's hope she stays out of any future prosecution decisions in this matter.
Using this theory Smith perjured himself by testifying the 2020 election was not stolen. He's been told the election has been stolen so he knows it was, and he is knowingly testifying falsely.
It's a given that J R Biden had no control of 'his' presidency, so who arranged for J Smith to have the authority that he had/has? That sink hole in the swamp needs to be probed.
Never underestimate your enemy, had he been successful it wold have set a precedent that would take like forever to overturn. In the meantime they'll fill prisons with Patriots who speak up.
Had Smith been successful Raymond, there would be no reversing it. That would then have moved the 2-A to first place, not something I want but something our founders foresaw.
Excellent explanation of Smith's professional history and motives. Did we, the taxpayers, fund his stint at the ICC?? It will be interesting to see how all of this plays out. So far, none of the bad actors have paid the price for their evil deeds.
The fundamental basis for the prosecution of fraud is that the speaker knowingly states a falsehood with an intent to deceive the listener.
Your post attempts to state that free-speech preempts any claims of fraud; this is an extremely well litigated aspect of free speech that you’re clearly on the wrong side of based on jurisprudence’s history.
The logical consequence of your position is that anyone accused of fraud could merely nest it in political speech to accomplish the fraud. This is clearly not something that would be tolerated in any functioning society.
With everything a person writes electronically, every place he has been, and every person he has been near, being vacuumed up by surveillance, we are all a ham sandwich.
That is disingenuous at best. The topic at hand was by definition political speech - the ELECTION was fraudulent. It is rich indeed to claim that allegations, justified as it turns out, of a fraudulent election are themselves fraud.
A motion to dismiss for lack of standing occurs almost immediately after a suit is filed so the issues were never litigated. Several very sophisticated lawyers believed there was fraud. But if a court refuses to hear the case that is it. Then those lawyers were subjected to lawfare, as was the former president and those who protested the election. Fulton County Georgia has admitted election procedures were not followed. The case brought there against President Trump's associates by the odious Fani Willis has been dropped by the lawyer substituted after her removal for misconduct. Lastly the DoJ filed suits last month to obtain records relating to the 2020 election. The same people who believe there was no irregularity in the w0w0 election spent years thinking Covid 19 was a naturally occuring virus, the vaccines prevented the spread thereof, the border was secure, inflation was transitory, Joe Biden was fine, Harris made sense, and Walz was a regular guy too. But over time it has been established conclusively otherwise. Frankly if 2024 had not been "too big to rig" I think the plan was to memory hole all of the issues with no one the wiser.
Still no proof. These sophisticated lawyers like Guiliani and Sydney (?) came across as bizarre. This elusive proof could have been revealed at any time but somehow never appears. Trump did try to twist Georgia into finding him more votes. Fani Willis behaved very stupidly. The man who replaced her is a Trump acolyte and was put in place to destroy the case.
P.S. Mike Pence is a traitor. He has also created a think tank, Advancing American Freedom (AAF), funded by international donors and orgs whose sole purpose is to destroy Trumps agenda, under the guise of restoring “traditional conservatism” - read: RINOs.
This wasn’t law enforcement—it was lawfare with a Soviet accent. Jack Smith didn’t misunderstand the First Amendment; he tried to route around it. By relabeling political speech as “fraud,” he attempted to jail a former president for believing—and saying—the wrong thing. That’s not American justice. That’s Orwellian thought-crime regime dressed up in legal jargon. Once prosecutors get to decide what you “knew,” free speech is dead on arrival. Today it’s Trump. Tomorrow, it’s any dissenter who refuses to bow to official truth. Smith’s theory belongs in The Hague, not the United States. We dodged a bullet—but only because voters, not courts, stopped it.
Amuse establishes the inescapable conclusion that Jack Smith acted unconstitutional and illegally in the criminal sense. His acts were designed not to vindicate known rights but to punish political speech and legitimate legal advocacy. The disbursement orgy that followed in Smith's wake was of the same cloth. Will the US Attorney in Miami, Jason Reding Quinones, put Smith in the target list along with Brennan et al? He is a capable independent prosecutor. I know him. He is a decent fellow. I was supposed to work with him on these cases and was ready to be sworn in as an Assistant US Attorney there. But AG Bondi overruled Quinones. Let's hope she stays out of any future prosecution decisions in this matter.
Using this theory Smith perjured himself by testifying the 2020 election was not stolen. He's been told the election has been stolen so he knows it was, and he is knowingly testifying falsely.
Bingo!
It's a given that J R Biden had no control of 'his' presidency, so who arranged for J Smith to have the authority that he had/has? That sink hole in the swamp needs to be probed.
Now charge Smith using the exact same logic, that he was attempting a fraud upon the court
And, all of the election fraud is being proven regularly - but, to discourage it, charge those responsible
Pure evil
Ahhh jack smith is fuckin retarded
Never underestimate your enemy, had he been successful it wold have set a precedent that would take like forever to overturn. In the meantime they'll fill prisons with Patriots who speak up.
Had Smith been successful Raymond, there would be no reversing it. That would then have moved the 2-A to first place, not something I want but something our founders foresaw.
Excellent explanation of Smith's professional history and motives. Did we, the taxpayers, fund his stint at the ICC?? It will be interesting to see how all of this plays out. So far, none of the bad actors have paid the price for their evil deeds.
Excellent analysis. The Smith theory also flips the burden of proof. Lastly, Mr. Smith does not look good in recent pics. He appears thin and drawn.
"A theory waiting to be revived", just as soon as Dems take power again.
We can't say we weren't warned.
Everytime I see him I think of Rasputin……a very bad person
The images used in this report certainly exaggerate his normal demonic appearance.
The fundamental basis for the prosecution of fraud is that the speaker knowingly states a falsehood with an intent to deceive the listener.
Your post attempts to state that free-speech preempts any claims of fraud; this is an extremely well litigated aspect of free speech that you’re clearly on the wrong side of based on jurisprudence’s history.
The logical consequence of your position is that anyone accused of fraud could merely nest it in political speech to accomplish the fraud. This is clearly not something that would be tolerated in any functioning society.
Isn’t the biggest fraud, that Smith practices at The Hague, not here.
With an international law that is not recognized here in The US.
Smith isn’t following our Constitution.
He’s following a law that is foreign.
Look at Europe today, jail for saying anything the Government doesn't like.
And rapidly morphing into thought crime, Raymond.
With everything a person writes electronically, every place he has been, and every person he has been near, being vacuumed up by surveillance, we are all a ham sandwich.
That is disingenuous at best. The topic at hand was by definition political speech - the ELECTION was fraudulent. It is rich indeed to claim that allegations, justified as it turns out, of a fraudulent election are themselves fraud.
Five years later and no evidence.
The suits were dismissed right off the bat for lack of standing so no evidence was presented.
But lots of claims were made and reported in media and all were nonsense. Then lots of recounts such as Arizona and crickets.
A motion to dismiss for lack of standing occurs almost immediately after a suit is filed so the issues were never litigated. Several very sophisticated lawyers believed there was fraud. But if a court refuses to hear the case that is it. Then those lawyers were subjected to lawfare, as was the former president and those who protested the election. Fulton County Georgia has admitted election procedures were not followed. The case brought there against President Trump's associates by the odious Fani Willis has been dropped by the lawyer substituted after her removal for misconduct. Lastly the DoJ filed suits last month to obtain records relating to the 2020 election. The same people who believe there was no irregularity in the w0w0 election spent years thinking Covid 19 was a naturally occuring virus, the vaccines prevented the spread thereof, the border was secure, inflation was transitory, Joe Biden was fine, Harris made sense, and Walz was a regular guy too. But over time it has been established conclusively otherwise. Frankly if 2024 had not been "too big to rig" I think the plan was to memory hole all of the issues with no one the wiser.
Still no proof. These sophisticated lawyers like Guiliani and Sydney (?) came across as bizarre. This elusive proof could have been revealed at any time but somehow never appears. Trump did try to twist Georgia into finding him more votes. Fani Willis behaved very stupidly. The man who replaced her is a Trump acolyte and was put in place to destroy the case.
Utterly diabolical. No other word for it.
P.S. Mike Pence is a traitor. He has also created a think tank, Advancing American Freedom (AAF), funded by international donors and orgs whose sole purpose is to destroy Trumps agenda, under the guise of restoring “traditional conservatism” - read: RINOs.
Has he been properly doxxed?
I'd like his mindset destroyed
This is intelligent insightful commentary. Thanks