22 Comments
User's avatar
Susan Daniels's avatar

Unions outlived their usefulness years ago. They now exist only to continue to pay large paychecks to the officers.

Kelly Donivan's avatar

Look at the disaster that unions have caused in California! The SEIU and the teacher's unions screw the dues payers and the rest of of us.

Kurt Wullenweber's avatar

Business wide unions are unions. Industry wide unions are cartels.

JDJAWS's avatar

And launder $$$ back to Democrat Party and DSA fat cats.

Kurt Wullenweber's avatar

Will NYC have to learn the lesson that you can't vote your way back out of communism?

Susan Daniels's avatar

It appears that way.

Silent scorn's avatar

Interesting! I was not aware of Amazon’s business model including small companies. Yes , stamp them out, we can’t have individuals becoming successful independently! 🙄

JDJAWS's avatar

Great article. I would only add:

Notice the architecture of what else a union produces--millions $$$ laundered back to the Democrat Party and DSA.

Kenneth Kirkham's avatar

In the 60's the teamster's rep bought a new motorhome after the contract negation. In the 70's the teamsters managed to demanded they get more pay than the skills that required actual knowledge. The company folded a few months later. In the 80's they charged my company over a $1,000 to move a pallet from the dock to our sales space. It was about 80'. DSA and teamsters should go together and be sent to the sun. Mabey Elon can help with that?

Andy's avatar

During B school, I did an internship at Bath Iron Works, in Labor Relations*. I could write a book.

*Or, as my lefty friend called it, “Union Busting?!?!?!”

Suzie's avatar

Communism’s #1 arch foe is private property, ownership of any kind. It gives that person skin in the game and individual power, and is therefore a threat to the “collective”. It is anthema to the communist project.

JDJAWS's avatar

Yes, the "warmth" of collectivism shines only on the Communist fat cats.

James Arthur's avatar

This insightful analysis is wasted on most midwits. I’ve been thinking a lot about Federalist No. 10 and Washington’s farewell address on factions and “political parties” and the legitimate fear that “unscrupulous men” will corrupt the Republic to benefit themselves. No one can deny that Congress is in the late stages of corruption the founders feared. Labor unions are no different.

Linda wallack's avatar

kill small business, and you kill those that can make a buck under the tax wire. These are the ones that would be harder to get to take the mark of beast in order to buy or sell....that's the ultimate goal.

Ronda Wells MD's avatar

Am I right that this would lead to more workers being forced into the Teamsters Union?

c Anderson's avatar

Yes, another democrat money laundering scheme. “Teamsters union dues are typically 2.5 times the base hourly wage per month, minus any license premiums.”

Thomas F Davis's avatar

“Families owning a business with two to five employees had a median net worth of $575,900 and a median income of $135,200. Families owning a business with more than five employees had a median net worth of about $1.25 million and a median income of $237,200.”

Ah, yes. The Kulaks.

Dawn Pegis's avatar

Is this a done (BAD) deal?!! Do union members vote? It sounds horrible. The exact opposite of human creativity freedom.

William Dwyer's avatar

Always inciteful.

For friendly Christian advice for a happy life

Visit: gentleinspiration.substack.com

Free Will's avatar

Illustrating, once again, that the Totalitarian left only represents the ruling class and bureaucracy. They will never protect anyone or help anyone. They will just smear and blame political opponents for everything.

goatsRstillgruffy's avatar

I dealt with a number of unions when I owned a unionized construction company in NJ for 20 years - Operating Engineers, Carpenters, Heavy General Laborers, Welders, Dockbuilders, Masons, and Building Trades. Once and once only with Teamsters. Teamster were the absolute worst. They believed in the old union way of using threats against companies when they didn't get their way, unlike the other unions which were managed by civilized, reasonable people.

Teamsters want this to pass to swell the member ranks and gain even more power, more money and political clout

Richard Luthmann's avatar

This is socialism doing what socialism always does: killing ownership and calling it protection. A driver who becomes an owner escapes the wage cage. He builds equity, hires people, learns operations, and creates something he can sell, expand, or leave to his children. The Teamsters do not want that. The DSA does not want that. They want workers standardized, centralized, unionized, dues-paying, and politically manageable. Cabán and Mamdani could have written rules for safety, pay, transparency, or cooperatives. They wrote a bill that makes ambition illegal. The delivery man may get a raise. What he loses is a company.